February 24, 1999
Although I am 44 years old, it no longer
surprises me to see myself referred to as a
"child" or to have a cutesy-pie baby graphic
accompanying an editorial on the right of adult
adoptees to access the documents recording their
own births ("Fight over adoption secrecy," Feb.
22). The idea that adult adoptees are perpetual
children is one that is promulgated over and over
again by the mass media, which ought to know
better.
These sorts of demeaning representations are part
of the reason I joined Bastard Nation two years
ago. It did surprise me to see the author imply
that my organization is somehow "outing their own
mothers." This is both inaccurate and insulting.
Bastard Nation's mission is narrow and very
public. We stand for the right of every person to
access the documents recording his or her own
birth. We also stand for the dignity of adult
adoptees. I can think of no better reason for our
continued existence and activism than editorials
such as yours, which describe adult adoptees as
"dangerous" and "angry" children.
We do not "exist on the Internet." Adult adoptees
are everywhere. You probably have some on your
editorial staff or in your newsroom.
Ron Morgan
Executive Committee
Bastard Nation
San Francisco
The editorial headlining that birth parents are
"elders" who need "privacy" from children
relinquished to adoption is a shrill, hysterical
fantasy. The reality is that many of the elders in
adoption today are the middle-aged and older
adoptees who seek to pass along genealogical and
medical information to their own children and
grandchildren before they die.
Adult adoptees are neither children nor vengeful
psychopaths in an alliance with their mothers'
rapists. Your tale of horror and fear is the
latest and most extreme in the ongoing abrogation
of the rights of citizens who are forbidden from
seeing their own birth certificates through no
fault of their own but as a result of archaic
laws that have existed in California since 1935.
Janine Baer
El Cerrito
It would be one thing if adoptees did not know that
they were adopted. But once they know, the mind
takes over.
I am a 39-year-old male adoptee. I have known
since I was 6 that I was adopted. Why is it, you
may ask, that I've waited this long to begin a
search?
Basically, I did not wish to hurt or offend my
adoptive parents, whom I love dearly. My adoptive
mother has passed on. It's been over five years
now, and my adoptive father has encouraged me "to
find out who I am."
I put my poor adoptive parents through hell all
the way through my teenage years and beyond. I
was searching for answers in all the wrong
places, and in all the wrong ways. This is
directly related to my adoption, or the feeling
of abandonment that comes with it.
Should adoptees have to go through their entire
lives in this detached and uncertain way?
Granted birth parents have rights, and in all
actuality they have done us adoptees a favor by
choosing life. I thank the Lord and my birth
mother on a regular basis for giving me life.
But unless there are circumstances surrounding
the adoption that warrant closed records, such as
rape or incest, records should be made available
to responsible adult adoptees.
After all, as adults, aren't we supposed to be
held accountable for our actions? And parents are
held accountable for their children's actions.
Why should birth parents be exempt from this
common rule or law of civilization?
Are you aware of how expensive it is to have a
search performed? Why should we be exploited by
some search organization when the information
could be made available for virtually nothing?
Once we know that we are adopted, we will search.
It is only a matter of how through legal
or illegal means. Haven't we, as adoptees, been
put through enough already? It must end
somewhere. Open records now!
David L. Blatter
Vacaville
I am one in thousands: an adoptee who searched for
the right to know about my heritage.
I found it along with the potential for breast
cancer, heart failure and various other cancers.
I am not sad that I found this out. I am happy
that I have the armament to control and now fight
these things head on.
My life along with the lives of other adoptees is
affected by such things as medical records. Can
you deny this right to a non-adoptee?
We as children are ridiculed by our peers. Such
things as, "You weren't wanted," and the
infamous, "Now I know why you're acting so
strangely."
My 23-year struggle searching and finding a way
to come to grips with a society that would cast
out a child for something she had absolutely no
control over came to an end when I found my
family. Honesty among the members of the family
about the wants and needs of each individual made
the reunion a bit more comfortable than what was
originally expected.
In finding my heritage I found 12 brothers and
sisters. All are individuals and special in their
own ways. My birth mother is kind and very
compassionate. My birth father is deceased. I am
still not completely in contact with everyone and
that is OK. My effect on their lives is based on
their needs too.
Debora Kyllar
San Jose
I am a birth mother who was raped. The stigma of
unwed pregnancy in 1969 prevented my family or
social services from helping me keep my baby.
Relinquishment was not my first choice.
After 19 long years I found my daughter. It was
important to me that she know how much I love her
and have thought about her over the years, and I
believed it was her right to know the truth.
The adoption reform movement in this country has
struggled since the 1950s to shed light on the
real issues and lifelong process of adoption for
adoptees, birth parents and adoptive parents. The
amended birth certificate of adoptees is one of
the first lies in every adoption. This legal
document declares the adoptive parents gave birth
to the child.
Measure 58 in Oregon takes a complicated issue
and simplifies it by giving back to adult
adoptees a basic human right to their
birth heritage. I know of several adult adoptees
who are honest citizens, married with children,
and who fought for their country in war and
cannot get passports because they cannot produce
their birth certificates.
And there are plenty of birth mothers like me who
love their children and would welcome them into
their lives. It is time for human rights to
triumph over fear.
Sheila Ganz
San Francisco
Measure 58 is not about search and reunion.
Adoptees and birth parents are already doing that
without open records. It is about restoring rights
to adult adoptees by allowing them to obtain their
original birth certificates.
Promoting anything but open records on demand for
adult adoptees is promoting discrimination, fear
and shame.
Truth and honesty will always prevail over
secrets and lies. This is as it should be.
Not very complicated, really.
Linda Elvin
San Jose
|